Anna Diggs Taylor

A U.S. District Judge from my homestate of Michigan paraded her total supidity and complete hatred for President Bush for everyone to see.

She has told our President that the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program is unconstitutional. Now, let's be honest here. This isn't about the wiretapping program, this is about the President being bashed be morons who want to play politics with OUR LIVES.
Look, we need to sort this out, this isn't a 'domestic spying' case. In order for it to be 'domestic' spying, the people on BOTH ends of the phone need to be in the same country. In this case ONE people in is America either taking calls or making them to someone in ANOTHER country who may be a terror suspect. This isn't our normal calls being tapped. People who think that are like those foil hat wearing fools who actually think President Bush had enought time to plan the 9/11 attacks.

This case was brought on by the A-ACLU, the Anti-American Civil Liberties Union, you know, the same group who defended the Westboro Baptist Church's right to harrass and protest outside the funerals of our fallen soldiers, the same A-ACLU who wants the U.S. to give terrorist the same rights and freedoms that we Americans have (By the way, these are the same rights and freedoms that these same terrorists are trying to DESTROY)

In her remarks she said:
"It was never the intent of the framers to give the president such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights," Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion. ". . . There are no hereditary Kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution. So all 'inherent powers' must derive from that Constitution."

It's the Presidents Constitutional DUTY to protect our country from it's enemies. Nearly every attempt to do so has been halted or ruined by people like this dumb broad and the major media who 'broke' this story by giving away National Security secrets (and have YET to be punished for it!)
My question is she claims the President doesn't have the right to protect us, but what gives HER the right to put us in harms way?

We haven't had a single terrorist attack on our land since 9/11. There have been countless attempts that have been stopped because of programs Anna Diggs Taylor of Michigan now claims is unconstitutional.
Does knowing our President is not able to fully protect us as is his duty make YOU FEEL SAFER?
How do you feel knowing there is a whole group of people, a whole political party, that is willing to play petty politics with our LIVES? Because they hate the man we voted in as President, does it give them the right to allow the enemies fo our Nation freedom to kill us at their whim soly because they don't like our President?


And, no, 9/11 was NOT an inside job. You fools who think so are wrong. Even if you were right, 9/11 happened when Bush was only 8 MONTHS into his first term.
You would need a longer amount of time to plan something like this...more like 8 YEARS and its not like we've had a President in office who ignored terrorism for 8 YEARS recently, have we?

Just a thought...

I think it's funny how the Dems will say

-you can't 'spy' on people who are getting and recieving calls from people in countries who sponsor terrorism or the who are themselves terrorists
-you can't hold terror suspects in any prison unless you charge them for something besides terrorism
-you can't make a terror suspect even the slightest bit uncomfortable or else it's called 'torture'
-you have to apologize for putting underware on the heads of prisoners because it's...torture?
-you have to apologize for a fake news story about holy books being flushed down toilets even though it was a FAKE news story
-you can't look closer at people from terror states because it's racist

Basically, you can't do ANYTHING to fight terrorism or protect our country yet these same morons are allowed to say the Bush Administration and the Republicans aren't doing enough to protect us from terrorism.

WHAT?!

ILLEGAL MEANS ILLEGAL

Alright, taking a break from the 'animal lovers' here in Portland, mostly cause its TO EASY to show their stupidity, I would like to focuse for a moment on:

Elvira Arellano.

This woman is currently 'taking refuge' in a Chicago church. She thinks this is a legal move for her to make or something. Honestly, this dumb broad knows NOTHING about the law, other thanhow to BREAK IT.

In 1997 she was arrested for being (get this) IN AMERICA ILLEGALLY! She was DEPORTED but returned ILLEGALLY only days later. She moved to Oregon, where you can be an illegal criminal and get a drivers license, job, housing, using all sorts of benifits paid for by AMERICAN tax payers...yeah, it's a great place if you support illegals and terrorism. Anyway, this twit lived here for 3 years, she moved to Chicago in 2000 where she was (dramatic pause) ARRESTED AGAIN 2 years later for working under a FALSE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.
Now, she doesn't want to be removed from our Nation, like she should be. She claims her 7 year old son is an American Citizen and doesn't want her to go anywhere.

Fine.

Send the little shit to Mexico WITH HER.

Why our law enforcement people aren't ENFORCING our laws on this moron is beyond me. They need to go in there, grab her ass and drag her out. Send her back to Mexico.
And all you people who are reading this who are crying "what about her right?!" and "how racist can you get?!"
Look, Her rights? SHE HAS NO RIGHTS. Our rights as outlined by the US Constitution only applies to AMERICANS. Our rights under our laws applies to Americans. The only rights I'm willing to give her is the right to main silent. Anything she says will be laughed at and ignored...provided she can speak it in ENGLISH.
I'll also give her the right to pack her shit and get the hell out.
And racist? I love how people are so willing to toss that word out like it's supposed to make people like me afraid to speak my mind. Look, all you people out there who use words like 'racist' and 'bigot' do you even know what those words mean? Obviously you don't if you are using them in this context. Am I a racist because I want this criminal removed from a country she has entered illegally TWICE? NO. Now, if she was an American who happened to be of Mexican descent and I said I wanted that dirty spic out of my country, THEN I would be a racist. The fact that she's a Mexican doesnt enter into it.
That fact that she's broken our laws 3 times does.

Retards and Animal Rights

You know, it boggles my mind how I'm told that if I 'hang around' those people who terrorize the furstore that I may be accused of being one of them and that is used to try to get me away...but...
I wonder if that means since they allow some foul-mouthed mental midget to join their 'protests' if that means they are trying to tell us something about their own mental problems...

just a thought

Another ROUND with IDA...

Well, the fun never ends when you have a group of people who value the lives of dead animals from the other side of the planet over their fellow humans or, dare I say it, LIVING ANIMALS in Portland!!!

Let me explain.

Last Saturday I stopped in Schumacher's to introduce myself to Linda. She wasn't there but I explained who I was to the people who were so it was cool. I'm hoping to be able to meet Linda face to face soon.
Anyway, while I was there, a rather 'small' group of protesters was outside being unusually quiet.
That is, until, some other customers walked in.
There were some remarks made but the shocking noise was made after the innocent customers walked out of the store. They were greeted with what sounded to me like a wounded dog or maybe the mating call of a rather large animal.

I was kind of wrong as the sound was coming from a rather large woman.

Later that afternoon Mike and I walked passed the store to get some food, MEAT, and had to walk around the rather large woman.

(Now, anyone who knows me knows that I've NEVER been one to pick on someone who was fat, stupid, ugly, ect...that is, unless, they DESERVED it.
This woman did.)

From the website of the IDA protesters: Do not block the sidewalk for foot traffic.

That's rule number 2.

She was blocking the sidewalk...of course, she couldn't help it, she would have had to stand in the middle of the road in order to NOT block the sidewalk.

So, we walked AROUND her and I was about 2 blocks away when she started screaming a bunch of crap about how the blood of some stupid dead animals was on the hands of the people in the store and it'll 'never wash off.'
I would try LAVA soap. That stuff is industrial, my dad uses it to get car grease and crap off his hands. It'll work on anything.

So, I walked back up to her and asked her why she had to be so loud.
Of course her reply was 'freedom of speech.'
That's ALWAYS their response because they have nothing to actually back their argument up with. I told her that her 'freedom of speech' only go so far, it ends when it begins to impeed on the rights of others. And my right to enjoy a nice Saturday afternoon without her baying was certainly being impeeded upon.
I guess she was more American than I am because her rather simple-minded response was SHE has the right to scream a bunch of bullshit while I don't have the right to tell her to keep it to a reasonable volume.
I asked her if she knew she was disturbing the peace. In her...mind she wasn't. She was within the law because AND I QUOTE "I lower my voice WHEN THE POLICE HAVE TOLD ME TO."

Lady, I got news for you, if the police have to tell you to shut your hole, then you aren't within the law. From the moment they have to say something to you, if you continue to do it, you are no longer within the law.

(now, the asshole part of me wants to make some remark about how it would be difficult for someone her size to remain withint ANYTHING much less the law but I won't)

So she goes back to saying my discussion with her is preventing her from speaking her...mind and I need to leave.
Huh....
So I stated: It's alright for you to say all this crap but when someone is actually willing to stand up to you they have to leave? You have to right to say whatever you want but I don't? Sorry, but the only people in this country the First Ammendment doesn't cover are those criminal scum bags who are here illegally.

Then they tried a new tactic: They tried to embarrass me!
This was done by some guy with hair I saw on a cartoon character somewhere. He walked up to me and told me that by being there people are going to think I was part of their group.
I guess he wasn't thinking. If I were part of that group A) they wouldn't be yelling at me to leave and B) I would have a drool cup tucked under my chin.

And of course their mascot, some mental case who couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag without swearing was there. I was told he has 'issues.' And to that I say tough shit. When you enter the arena of ideas and you enter any level of a political debate then you open yourself up to everything you dish out. Retarded or not. 13 years old or not.
If your going to dish it out, then you damn well better be ready to take it.
While I was there Retardo screamed at some people in a passing car calling them "fucking yuppies"
From their website again: 3) Do not make personal attacks on people

Okay so today we learned that in their twisted version of America only THEY have freedom of speech, they can break any law they want as long as the police aren't there and their own rules on their own website don't mean a damn thing.

************************************************************************************
Now, about the LIVING ANIMALS remark I made. I was thinking about these loonies the other day and it occured to me, their hypocrisy knows no bounds. Not only do they hate businesses that sell fur yet work and/or shop at others who sell meat, not only do they claim to hate fur because the poor animals are killed to make it yet support PETA, a group that murders over 2,000 cats, dogs, puppies and kittens a YEAR, they also seem to care more about animals on the other side of the globe yet ignore whats right in front of their faces.
I overheard one of these people tear into a guy who dared to disagree by saying 'I'm doing something, what are you doing to make the world a better place?'
To this I say the best way to make the world a better place is to make your HOME a better place. While these so-called animal lovers are pissing and moaning about animals from China, we have HOMELESS animals here in Portland that they don't give a damn about. How many people have seen these bums and beggers harrassing people on the street for money they are to lazy to work for themselves and have a dog or a cat? I saw some twit with 2 dogs and a kitten once begging for money. If these so-called animal lovers actually cared about what they claim to care about they would be doing something about getting these poor animals into solid homes, not trying to put a family out of business.

Over the weekend

Last week the owners of the Schumacher's Fur store were on vacation. This means they were not open for business this past weekend.

I didn't blame them for going on vacation, afterall, they get terrorized every Saturday by a bunch of loonies who hate legal business, they get NO respect or protection from our supposed city leaders (but if they were a terror group they would!), so, vacation was needed.

Sadly, the loonies who protest weren't on vacation as well. They still had a group out front protesting a CLOSED store. Granted the group was considerably smaller but that doesn't change the fact they are still full of crap.
Their television was IN FRONT of the stores closed gates, which I'm sure had to violate some law, they also propped their stupid signs along the store front, probably because there wasn't as many loonies to hold them this time.

My part came when I was simply walking along, minding my own business when some 'anti-fur' vegan thin chick wanted to hand me a flyer pimping their sad little group.
I told her if that flyer doesn't say your group actually supports the killing of animals then I don't want it.
She was confused, they usually are if you don't simply believe everything they say and shut up.
I had to educate her by telling her that her group, IDA, supports and is supported by PETA which kills over 2,000 animals a year.

It's funny how these people are so willing to ignore THEIR support of the murder of thousands of helpless puppies, kittens, cats, and dogs...animals who they CAN help, animals who are murdered simply because PETA won't find them homes, yet they will demand that a business, whose sole purpose is the selling of fur, be closed down with no regard to the fact that the business has been in Portland for over 111 years!!

The reality is these animals used for fur are raised for that specific purpose. There isn't a thing wrong with that.

Now, keep this in mind, people, these so-called animals rights nuts aren't going to stop at fur stores. No, in their mind EVERY animal should be free of human 'abuse'
This includes PETS, zoos, seeing eye dogs, FOOD and anything else animals are used for.
Basically, they have no respect for their fellow HUMAN. We need to stand up to groups like PETA and IDA and tell them to simply go home and get a hobby. And don't let them scream in your face that you hate animals, no, simply tell them you LOVE animals, as pets or in some cases medium rare with a HUGE pile of mashed potatoes!

Hell, go here and get yourself a t-thirt!
I may do that myself!!!

I refuse to live in a country where the loud minority can get away with telling me what I can wear and that I cannot eat meat!!!

Listen up:
Eating meat is NATURAL.
Being a vegan isnt.
Think about it, how many vegans like to boast about their bone thin lifestyle by proclaiming they CHOSE to be vegan?
Yet they claim it's natural...if somthing is natural, then you don't need to CHOOSE to do it, now do you?