Anna Diggs Taylor

A U.S. District Judge from my homestate of Michigan paraded her total supidity and complete hatred for President Bush for everyone to see.

She has told our President that the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance program is unconstitutional. Now, let's be honest here. This isn't about the wiretapping program, this is about the President being bashed be morons who want to play politics with OUR LIVES.
Look, we need to sort this out, this isn't a 'domestic spying' case. In order for it to be 'domestic' spying, the people on BOTH ends of the phone need to be in the same country. In this case ONE people in is America either taking calls or making them to someone in ANOTHER country who may be a terror suspect. This isn't our normal calls being tapped. People who think that are like those foil hat wearing fools who actually think President Bush had enought time to plan the 9/11 attacks.

This case was brought on by the A-ACLU, the Anti-American Civil Liberties Union, you know, the same group who defended the Westboro Baptist Church's right to harrass and protest outside the funerals of our fallen soldiers, the same A-ACLU who wants the U.S. to give terrorist the same rights and freedoms that we Americans have (By the way, these are the same rights and freedoms that these same terrorists are trying to DESTROY)

In her remarks she said:
"It was never the intent of the framers to give the president such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights," Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion. ". . . There are no hereditary Kings in America and no powers not created by the Constitution. So all 'inherent powers' must derive from that Constitution."

It's the Presidents Constitutional DUTY to protect our country from it's enemies. Nearly every attempt to do so has been halted or ruined by people like this dumb broad and the major media who 'broke' this story by giving away National Security secrets (and have YET to be punished for it!)
My question is she claims the President doesn't have the right to protect us, but what gives HER the right to put us in harms way?

We haven't had a single terrorist attack on our land since 9/11. There have been countless attempts that have been stopped because of programs Anna Diggs Taylor of Michigan now claims is unconstitutional.
Does knowing our President is not able to fully protect us as is his duty make YOU FEEL SAFER?
How do you feel knowing there is a whole group of people, a whole political party, that is willing to play petty politics with our LIVES? Because they hate the man we voted in as President, does it give them the right to allow the enemies fo our Nation freedom to kill us at their whim soly because they don't like our President?


And, no, 9/11 was NOT an inside job. You fools who think so are wrong. Even if you were right, 9/11 happened when Bush was only 8 MONTHS into his first term.
You would need a longer amount of time to plan something like this...more like 8 YEARS and its not like we've had a President in office who ignored terrorism for 8 YEARS recently, have we?